Free Web space and hosting from human-rights.org
Search the Web

SPECIAL EDITION OF GRAVE PUBLIC CONCERN:

Local Magistrate - Under Sheriff & Solicitor, Roger Browne of Daltons involved in Fraud, Arson, & Criminal cover-up - implicating MP Michael Latham, Police Forces of Lincolnshire and Leicestershire. The integrity of the Realm is in Jeopardy when officials abuse their authority selling the LAW to the highest bidder - JUSTICE is for all people!

MILLIONS of pounds worth of TRADE stolen from STAMFORD citizens.

The Freemasons of Stamford in Lincolnshire have been feeling decidedly touchy lately due to the actions of one man. Mr.Paul Jenkins of Home Farm, Greetham, near Oakham has been waging an unnerving war against members of the Stamford masonic brotherhood to expose the fraud and corruption of some members. In particular Mr.Jenkins is trying to obtain justice and compennsation for a fire which severely damaged the family home in 1977. For Mr.Jenkins the matter did not rest there. He has proof which he claims shows that the fire was a deliberate act and he claims he has been victimised ever since. He claims that Freemasonry is not all that it is claimed to be by spokesmen for the organisation. The solicitor he employed to pursue his claim, one Roger Edward Browne of Daltons solicitors, Barnhill Stamford, led Mr.Jenkins along for seven whole years believing that a substantial payment would be forthcoming. The term used by Browne was "in the high five figures!" After seven years Browne dropped the case because the time limit had been reached; the verdict of the defence counsel was that the delay in prosecuting the case was both "inordinate and inexcusable". Reviewing the multitude of letters and documents pertaining to the case it is easy to believe that the case was sabotaged deliberately. The Law Society actually instructed Browne to "get a move on" and get the case to court with all possible haste. Browne wrote a letter to Mr.Jenkins insurers, the Co-Op, telling them that the case was hopeless because negligence could not be proved and because the defences principle witness was a reliable person and likely to be believed. Implying that the plaintiff and his witnesses were not reliable. The defence witness however, made two separate and contradictory statements which were recorded verbatim, the first to the defences own forensic expert in which he told of a fire so intense that when he put his head into the attic it was so hot he was beaten back hy the flames and heat, In the seconid statement to the Plaintiffs forensic expert he told of how he fought the fire with a hose and by beating with wet sacks so that he had virtually put the fire out by the time the fire brigade arrived The Fire officers report concurred with the first statement.

A key witness, one Eric Brunning who was working on the roof at the time insisted that he was not smoking

The photograph reproduced here, appeared on the front page of the Stamford & Rutland Mercury in August 1977. It clearly shows a well established fire. Roger Browne succeeded in destroying evidence, preferring the deliberate lies and contradictions of the defendants to the detriment of the Jenkins' case.
although the defences case hangs on an assumption, only, that he was. Brunning reported that he was actually on the roof at the time when he heard a dull muffled thud when the "explosion" occurred and smoke began to issue from between tne tiles. The defence say he was inside. Brunning was killed, while riding his motor cycle, by a hit and run motorist. The police never managed to trace the car. The defences main witness Mr.Carpenter said that he ran around looking for sacks and a hose pipe with which to fight the fire. There were no sacks and there was no hose pipe long enough. It was reported that Carpenter tried to prevent Brunning from calling the fire brigade; it is just as well that Brunning did call the brigade otherwise the house would have been a total ruin. Mr.Jenkins claims that Roger Browne is a Freemason attending the Vale of Welland lodge and Montagu chapter which meet at the old Bluecoats school in Stamford. The seven year period is crucial to what followed for the Jenkins family.



THE FRAUDULENT BANK.

Coincident with Browne dropping the case, there occurred a number of apparently unrelated incidents. Mr.Jenkins' bank, the NatWest in Stamford made what appeared to be serious errors in his accounts - large sums of money were never credited to the accounts, sums of money which involved paymente for export orders. One such sum cost his business a £68,000 order. The bank even attempted to involve Mr.Jenkins in fraud, Mr.Jenkins showed me a letter on bank headed paper proving the fraud. Several sums of money, paid by the Bank of England direct to a trust fund account for his two children, and totalling some £3,500 vanished and were never credited. Lincolnshire C.I.D were involved and eventually the bank produced what can only be termed as a "cobbled up" statement covering the 18 month period during which the money went "missing". The statement was typed on one of the branch's own typewriters and did not come off the computer. The bank never sent Mr.Jenkins a copy and he has never seen the money. He did manage to persuade the police to let him have a copy of their copy. The police took no funther action. The manager of the bank, Mr.K.C.Broughton of Ketton. retired at the age of 56 on a full pension. Mr. Jenkins says the proof of the bank's fraud is confirmed by the fact that the bank have taken no action to recover the £36,000 overdraft, outstanding now for twelve years!

BANK MANAGER INVOLVED IN FRAUD REWARDED WITH EARLY RETIREMENT ON FULL PENSION! CRIME DOES PAY!

Concurrently with this, one Mr.Andrew Barnes living at Kings Cliffe and owner director of Veetrac Engineering Ltd at Corby attempted to involve Mr. Jenkins in arson and fraud when Veetracs factory caught fire in June 1984. Unfortuneately Mr.Jenkins became involved because some of his own equipment was lost in the fire. Mr.Barnes has been paid in full for Mr.Jenkins equipment by his insurers but so far Mr.Jenkins has not received one penny. Mr.Jenkins reports that he was asked, nay pressed by Barnes to falsify an order for diesel engines to increase the value for the insurance claim. Barnes told Mr.Jenkins that he was under insured and the only way he could guarantee to pay Mr.Jenkins for his goods was to increase the value of other claims. The engines in question were valued at three times the original cost. Mr Jenkins believes this was yet another way in which to discredit him.

SHERIFF & LOCAL MAGISTRATE USES POLICE TO RECTIFY MASONIC COCK-UP!

The next incident, is one which gives grave cause for concern becasse it involved the police, the local bailiff and the Sherrif\'92s office in an abuse of authority; Mr.Jenkins told the Mail reporter that it was this incident which caused him to investigate the involvement of Freemasonry. It was this incident, according to Mr.Jenkins, which proved to him that Roger Browne, the solicitor, magistrate and under sheriff was involved in the initiation of these attempts to discredit him. A company, previously unknown to Mr.Jenkins, one H.B.Raylor Ltd of York approached Mr.Jenkins asking him if he would advertise a large generator which they had had in stock for some years. Obviously it was a financial embarassment to Raylors. Mr. Jenkins featured the generator on the front page of his monthly catalogue. Within three weeks a printing firm in Mansfield made an enquiry for a large machine, not guite as large as the one offered by Raylors. Mr.Jenkins offered the printers, W.J.Linney & Co, several machines closer to the size they required. Each time one was offered it was decided that somthing lager was required. This happened several times until it came to the Raylor set. Mr. Jenkins arranged for representatives from Linnneys to view the machine and indeed he drove them to York. Two or three incidents that day caused Mr.Jenkins to be cautious; however, Linneys decided to order the machine and negotiated a price to include installation and supply of a panel and cables. Mr.Jenkins left Linneys with a promise that the order would be confirmed in writing, but that he should make all possible haste to deliver the set to site. Delivery was agreed for the following Friday by which time a concrete base would be ready. Mr.Jenkins drove to York to see the machine loaded and to pay for it. When he arrived, the machine was already loaded. He went into the offices of Raylors, but no one knew anything about payment nor was there an invoice ready. The wagon left Raylors. After about 15 minutes Mr.Jenkins was told to ring his office, which he did. He was told that Linneys had asked that delivery be delayed until the following week. Mr.Jenkins caught up with the wagon on the Al and told the driver to take the machine to Stamford instead of Mansfield. For three weeks Linneys kept stalling with the excuse that Nick Linney, the managing director, was on holiday and nothing could be done until his return. Mr. Jenkins visited Linneys to discover that the concrete base had never been laid.

THE 'STING' THAT BACKFIRED!

At this stage Mr.Jenkins knew for sure they never had any intention of purchasing that particular machine. When he eventually contacted Mr.Linney he said to Mr. Jenkins "Haven,t you been told, we don't want it". Mr Jenkins had never had an invoice for the machine and it still remained unpaid for; he effered to return it to Raylors. They refused to accept it and demanded paymant. Mr. Jenkins told them it was not his policy to buy this type of machine for stock and that it had only been advertised for sale direct to a customer. Mr. Jenkins told them that he would still try to sell the machine for them and keep it on the catalogue. This was not good enough for Raylors. They began clandestine operations to discover where the machine was stored. First of all two men were seen walking up and down the footpath that runs beside Mr.Jenkins' paddock. They were very interested in what was in the paddock and were not appropriately attired for footpath walking. When they were discovered they beat a hasty retreat. The next event was a telephone call from a man purporting to be a prospective buyer, who arranged to meet Mr Jenkins in Stamford but said he would call back to confirm a time. He never did call back. However, what did happen was that Raylors called at the site complete with wagon and crane, and accompanied by several policemen and the county bailiff. No court papers were produced, in fact Raylors had never applied to the court and had no need to since Mr Jenkins offered to return the machine to them. The question we should be addressing is this; in a civil matter such as this was, the police never become involved. So, we should ask how did they become involved on this occasion and who authorised their involvement?

In fact if you or I wish to recover something that was a matter of civil and not criminal law the police would decline to give assistantce. The police themselves say they will only act on the issue of a warrant from a court, they say they are powerless to do otherwise in civil matters. The bailiff's involvement posses a similar question. He will only act on the instruction of the local sheriff. Now we come to the interesting part. Roger Browne, solicitor, magistrate and under sheriff is a Freemason of the Vale of Welland Lodge and Montagu chapter in Stamford. Harry B. Raylor and John W.Raylor are Freemasons in the North and East Riding of Yorkshire province, both are officers of Provincial Grand Rank. Mr Nicholas Linney is also a Freemason.

The inference is therefore obvious, that Browne issued instructions to the bailiff and to the police, getting them to act through the influence of Freemasonry. I put it to Mr.Jenkins that this seemed rather fanciful and a very elaborate plan to discredit him and why should people unknown to him become involved. He went on to explain what had happened while he worked for Tempest Diesels of Stamford when it was still part of the Newage group. While visiting Iraq to install some generators he was invited to tender for the supply of irrigation equipment. The order would be worth about 2.5 million pounds. In Iraq it is illegal to pay commissions to people there. Needless to say there are ways around this, and Tempest had already agreed to pay a £5000 commission on the previous sale, ten percent of the order value in fact. Mr Jenkins was promised the order if Tempest could supply. Mr Jenkins never did see the tender document because the then Managing Director, Trevor Sainsbury, intecepted it and diverted it to Industrial Engines Ltd in Granthan, now trading under the name 'Daltons Power Products'. The commission has never been paid to the Iraqi syndicate, and Mr Jenkins believes that further valuable trade has been lost as a result of this fraud. Mr Jenkins told the Mail reporter that he has been reliably informed that rumours have been circulating tnat he arranged the theft of the order for Iraq and that he kept the commission for himself. After he left Tempest, a relative of his contact in Iraq came to see him expecting to pick up the commission for he had been told that he must get the commission from Mr.Jenkins. Mr. Jenkins was made redundant from Industrial Engines Ltd in 1974 because he refused to falsify records, a fraud he claims that ran into tens of thousands of pounds. It was common knowledge, he says, that Industrial Engines received many enquiries and orders via Trevor Sainsbury that were meant for Tempest Diesels, and that Sainsbury regularly received a commission. The General Manager of Industrial engines at that time was also a Special Constable with the Lincolnshire police. Mr Jenkins says that he was investigating the co-incidence of Raylors and Linneys and how they fitted into the picture, when he saw one John Broadbelt at the Masonic centre. Now John Broadbelt used to work for Newage in the sales department and would have had contact with generator manufacturers such as Raylors. John Broadbelt is also a Royal Arch Mason, attending the same chapter, Montagu, as Roger Browne. There are other background incidents which all go towards a more convincing picture of active conspiraoy including the oontrived termination of his career with Tempest and, he suspects now, the deliberate burning of his house and the possible murder of Eric Brunning the chief wltness at the scene of the fire.  

IN THE SHADOW OF HUNGERFORD 24 ARMED POLICE ARREST OUR GALLANT HERO & THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR BACKS DOWN.

From the evidence I have seen myself I fail to understand why a claim for damages was not pursued successfully, for indeed it seems there are many irregularities, and contradictions by the defence. For this reason alone I can believe Mr Jenkins' story. He also tells me that he has the word of two Iraqis that they would be prepared to testify in any court case. I understand from Mr Jenkins that neither the Home Secretary nor the Solicitor General, nor the Public Prosecutor have responded to his allegations. As an alternative to court action, Mr Jenkins wrote letters to many newspapers, and finally, a letter to the Daily Mail in October 1987 sparked off a police arrest. The crime had to be serious enough for Mr.Jenkins to get to Crown Court and trial by jury. At the final moment the Public Prosecutor withdrew charges against Mr.Jenkins because, as Mr Jenkins claims, of the damning evidence against not only Freemasons in Stamford, but against Freemasonry in general. Mr Jenkins also reported that the police were trying to pin on him a conspiracy to rob the National Westminster bank in Stamford, which was the bank that defrauded him in 1984. Mr.Jenkins believes this was a set up in response to the leaflet he was issuing publicising the bank's malpractices. 

THE IMPEACHMENT OF THE LEICESTER DISTRICT REGISTRY.

As Mrs.Jenkins was now the only member of the family earning any money, the cowardly villains turned their attention to her. She worked for the Home Office, and a criminal record would finish her off. She was arrested in 1988 and charged with allegedly stealing boat hire tickets from Rutland Water. She was wary about working for the new owner who kept up a constant barrage of telephone calls pestering her to work for him at weekends. She elected trial at Crown Court in Leicester. The barrister representing her told her solicitor that she should attend court on the pretext that an adjournment was being applied for because one of her witnesses was away on holiday. She turned up at the court to be faced with a full blown trial before judge and jury. She was totally unprepared, having left all her evidence and documents at home. During the trial she was denied witnesses and the proof of her innocence was not allowed to be put before the court. The primary charge, a 'specimen charge' was put before the court, but was never explained to her. after her barrister had made his closing speech, the prosecution announced that there were other charges to be taken into consideration. Because the original charge was a 'specimen charge' no defence is permitted on the additional charges. In other words she was convicted without any possibility of defending herself. The trial was so clearly rigged, any child would have noticed.

The judge, in his summing up, told the jury to find her guilty. When the jury returned and declared a guilty verdict, the judge decided not to punish her, no fine, nothing, just to keep the peace for 12 months.

MP MICHAEL LATHAM KEEPS A WATCHING BRIEF!

What was MP Michael Latham up to when he employed the services of a solicitor, H.P.Partridge, to keep a 'Watching Brief' on the case? (See the copy letter).

2. At a case heard before Mr.Registrar Horsey in the Melton Mowbray Court, Mr.Jenkins was seeking to recover money owed to him. He was represented by a solicitor from Grantham. The case was due to be heard at 10.30 am. The defendant was not in attendance. Mr. Horsey addressed Mr.Jenkins solicitor to the effect that the court would wait for the defendant because he, Registrar Horsey knew the defendant was coming, he had spoken with him on the telephone about the case! After five minutes, Mr.Registrar Horsey left the court saying that he was going to telephone the defendant's office to see if he was on the way. The defendant arrived 20 minutes late. During the defence evidence, Mr.Jenkins noted that the defendant told a deliberate lie. He stated that he had telephoned and spoken to Mr.Jenkins on a certain day at 9.00 am. There was an entry on his loose leaf work sheet to that effect. Mr.Jenkins was in fact in Birmingham at that time, having left home at 7.30 am. Neither Mr.Jenkins nor his solicitor were permitted to question the defendant on his statement. The defendant lied profusely about other matters of evidence. The case was awarded against Mr.Jenkins together with costs.

The letter above is addressed to Superintendent J.Mousley at Melton Mowbray Police Station.

"I write to confirm our telephone conversation that I am representing Mr.Michael Latham concerning the case of Jenkins.

"Of course I am representing Mr.Latham in a 'Watching brief' capacity and I will be grateful if you can let me know in due course when Mrs Jenkins is due to appear in court.

Yours sincerely - H.P.Partridge.

GO TO YOUR MP IF YOU HAVE A PROBLEM????

Mr.Jenkins has letters from Mr.Latham sufficient to paper his sitting room, but still he does not have a just outcome from the fire which damaged the family home - just, what most of us would consider a lot of bad luck ever since. Mr.Jenkins has identified the answer which most people keep asking all their lives!Read the full story in this fascinating new book. Your life will never be the same again.

IT COULD HAPPEN TO YOU AT ANYTIME!